Slash Polars Memory: 5 Proven Fixes for Graphs 2025
Struggling with Polars memory errors on large graphs? Discover 5 proven fixes for 2025 to slash memory usage, from smart data typing to streaming.
Elena Petrova
Data scientist and performance optimization enthusiast specializing in large-scale data processing with Python.
You’ve meticulously prepared your graph data—millions of nodes, tens of millions of edges. You fire up your Jupyter notebook, load the data into a Polars DataFrame, and start running what you think is a simple query. Then, silence. The kernel dies. Your terminal screams: Killed: 9. The dreaded Out-of-Memory (OOM) error has struck again.
We’ve all been there. Polars is a blazingly fast DataFrame library, but its speed relies on holding data in RAM. When you’re wrestling with massive graph structures, it’s easy to hit that memory ceiling. But what if you could have the speed of Polars and handle graphs that are far larger than your available RAM?
Welcome to graph analysis in 2025. Forget the old compromises. Here are five proven, battle-tested fixes that will slash your Polars memory usage and let you focus on what matters: uncovering insights from your complex network data.
Downcast, Downcast, Downcast: Your First Line of Defense
This is the single most effective, low-effort change you can make. When you load data, Polars often defaults to generous data types: 64-bit integers (Int64
) for numbers and standard strings (Utf8
) for text. For graph data, this is almost always overkill.
Your node and edge IDs probably don't need the astronomical range of an Int64
. If you have 10 million nodes, your highest node ID is 9,999,999. This fits comfortably within a 32-bit unsigned integer (UInt32
), which has a max value of over 4 billion. The difference is staggering:
- Int64: 8 bytes per ID
- UInt32: 4 bytes per ID
You’ve just cut the memory for your ID columns in half. Apply this to your source and target columns in your edge list, and you’re looking at massive savings before you’ve even done any real work.
Here’s how to do it right at the source, during the read operation, which is the most memory-efficient way:
import polars as pl
# Define the optimal types for your edge list
edge_dtypes = {
"source_id": pl.UInt32,
"target_id": pl.UInt32,
"weight": pl.Float32, # Do you really need Float64 precision?
"relationship_type": pl.Categorical # More on this soon!
}
# Use the dtypes argument when scanning the file
edges_df = pl.read_csv("large_edge_list.csv", dtypes=edge_dtypes)
print(edges_df.estimated_size("mb"))
Don’t just stop at IDs. Do your edge weights really need 64-bit precision? Probably not. Float32
is often sufficient. Are there node or edge attributes with a low number of unique values (like "relationship_type": 'FRIEND', 'FOLLOWS', 'MENTION')? Use the pl.Categorical
type. Polars will store the unique strings once and use cheap integer pointers under the hood, dramatically reducing memory for repetitive text data.
Let the Lazy Engine Do the Heavy Lifting
Eager execution—running one command at a time—feels intuitive, but it’s a memory trap. Every time you filter a DataFrame or create a new column, Polars creates a new, intermediate DataFrame in memory. With complex graph queries, these copies add up fast.
The solution is to embrace Polars' lazy API. Instead of telling Polars how to do something step-by-step, you describe what you want the final result to be. You build a query plan, and Polars’ powerful query optimizer figures out the most memory-efficient way to get it done. It can reorder your filters, perform operations simultaneously, and avoid creating those huge intermediate objects.
Imagine you want to find all outgoing connections from 'high-influence' nodes. Here's the memory-hungry eager way vs. the sleek lazy way:
# Assume 'nodes' and 'edges' DataFrames are loaded
# Eager Way (Bad! Creates intermediate DataFrames)
high_influence_nodes = nodes.filter(pl.col("follower_count") > 10000) # Copy 1
result_eager = edges.join(
high_influence_nodes,
left_on="source_id",
right_on="node_id"
) # Copy 2
# Lazy Way (Good! Builds a plan, no intermediate copies)
result_lazy = (
edges.lazy() # Start a lazy query
.join(
nodes.lazy().filter(pl.col("follower_count") > 10000),
left_on="source_id",
right_on="node_id"
)
.collect() # Execute the optimized plan
)
The lazy version looks cleaner, but the real magic is invisible. Polars might perform the filter on `nodes` while it’s performing the join, never needing to allocate memory for the full `high_influence_nodes` DataFrame. Start all your complex queries with .lazy()
and end them with .collect()
. Your RAM will thank you.
The Magic of Global String Caching
If you used pl.Categorical
as suggested in the first fix, you're already on the right track. But what if you have multiple DataFrames with the same string-based keys? For example, a `nodes` DataFrame with `user_name` and an `events` DataFrame also with `user_name`. By default, Polars will store the strings for 'user_name' separately for each DataFrame.
Enter the global string cache. By enabling this feature, you tell Polars to create a single, process-wide pool for all categorical strings. When you enable it, every time Polars sees a string value for a categorical column, it checks if it already exists in the global cache. If so, it just points to it. If not, it adds it.
This means a string like "SuperGraphUser123" will only ever be stored once in your entire application's memory, no matter how many DataFrames it appears in.
Enabling it is laughably simple:
import polars as pl
# Enable the magic *before* you load any data
pl.enable_string_cache(True)
# Now, load your data using the Categorical type
nodes = pl.read_csv("nodes.csv", dtypes={"user_name": pl.Categorical})
events = pl.read_csv("events.csv", dtypes={"user_name": pl.Categorical})
# Disable it when you're done if you need to free the cache memory
# pl.disable_string_cache()
For any graph analysis involving multiple datasets with shared textual identifiers, this is a non-negotiable optimization. It’s a one-line change that can save you gigabytes.
Rethinking Your Graph Joins and Aggregations
Joins are the bread and butter of graph analysis—they're how you connect nodes to edges, find paths, and aggregate neighborhood information. But a standard `inner` join can often be overkill and create unnecessarily large tables.
Polars offers a variety of join strategies, and choosing the right one is key. Let’s say you want to get your edge list, but only for edges that start from a 'verified' node. The naive approach is an inner join:
# Naive approach
verified_nodes = nodes.filter(pl.col("is_verified") == True)
edges_from_verified = edges.join(verified_nodes, left_on="source_id", right_on="node_id")
This works, but `edges_from_verified` now contains all the columns from `edges` and all the columns from `verified_nodes`. You probably didn't need that. You just wanted to use `verified_nodes` as a filter.
A much more memory-efficient approach is a semi-join:
# Efficient approach using a semi-join
verified_nodes = nodes.filter(pl.col("is_verified") == True)
edges_from_verified = edges.join(
verified_nodes,
left_on="source_id",
right_on="node_id",
how="semi"
)
A semi-join returns only the rows from the left DataFrame (`edges`) that have a matching key in the right DataFrame (`verified_nodes`). The columns from the right DataFrame are never added, making the resulting table much smaller and the operation much faster.
Beyond RAM: Embracing the Streaming Revolution
What happens when your graph is so enormous that even with all these optimizations, it simply won't fit in RAM? This is the reality of 2025-scale datasets. This is where Polars' streaming API becomes your superpower.
Streaming allows Polars to process a dataset in smaller, manageable chunks without ever loading the whole thing into memory. It works hand-in-hand with the lazy API. You start by *scanning* your files instead of *reading* them. A scan immediately returns a LazyFrame; it doesn't actually read any data yet.
You then build your entire lazy query plan just as before. The final step is to call .collect(streaming=True)
. This tells Polars to execute your plan by streaming the data from disk, applying the operations chunk by chunk, and only materializing the final, often much smaller, result.
Let's calculate the out-degree for every node in a 100GB edge list file—a task that would be impossible to do in memory on most machines.
# This will work even if 'massive_edges.parquet' is 500GB
out_degrees = (
pl.scan_parquet("massive_edges.parquet") # Scan, don't read!
.group_by("source_id")
.agg(pl.count().alias("out_degree"))
.collect(streaming=True) # EXECUTE IN STREAMING MODE!
)
print(out_degrees.head())
Polars will stream the Parquet file, calculate the counts for each chunk, and combine the results at the end. The maximum memory used will be related to the size of a chunk and the size of the final aggregated result, not the 500GB source file. This is the ultimate escape hatch and the key to working with virtually limitless data.
Your Memory-Efficient Polars Future
OOM errors don't have to be a routine part of graph analysis. By moving beyond default settings and embracing the powerful features Polars provides, you can build robust, scalable, and memory-efficient pipelines.
Let's recap the game plan:
- Downcast aggressively: Use the smallest possible integer and float types.
- Think lazy: Build query plans to let the optimizer save you memory.
- Cache strings: Use the global string cache for shared text identifiers.
- Join smartly: Use semi-joins for filtering instead of inner joins.
- Stream big data: Use
scan_*
andcollect(streaming=True)
for datasets that exceed your RAM.
Stop fighting your tools and start building bigger, more complex, and more insightful graphs. With Polars and these techniques, memory is no longer the final frontier—your imagination is.