Fix NgClass & Dialog Sync: 3 Simple Steps for 2025
Struggling with NgClass not updating in your Angular Material Dialog? Learn 3 simple, modern steps for 2025 to fix sync issues and ensure perfect state management.
Elena Petrova
Angular GDE and state management enthusiast passionate about clean, maintainable code.
You’ve meticulously crafted a beautiful Angular Material dialog. It’s sleek, it’s functional, and it’s ready to wow your users. You pass in some data, and based on a specific state, you want to apply a dynamic class using [ngClass]
. Maybe it's a 'status-critical'
class to turn a header red, or an 'is-processing'
class to show a subtle animation.
You bind it, you run it, you open the dialog, and... nothing. The class isn't there. You check the console—no errors. You stare at your code, which looks perfectly valid. You've just hit one of Angular's most common and frustrating little quirks: the change detection disconnect between a dynamically created dialog and its parent.
If this scenario sounds painfully familiar, you're in the right place. For years, developers have battled this issue with various workarounds. But as we head into 2025, the solutions have become more elegant, more declarative, and more powerful. Today, we're going to break down this problem and give you three simple, modern steps to fix it for good.
Why Does This Sync Issue Happen? A Quick Refresher
Before we dive into the fixes, let's understand the root cause. This isn't a bug; it's a feature of how Angular's change detection and dynamic components work. The issue typically arises from a combination of two factors:
- Dynamic Component Creation: Services like Angular Material's
MatDialog
don't just show/hide a component in your template. They dynamically create and inject the component into a special overlay container, often appended directly to the<body>
. This means the dialog component lives in a different part of the DOM tree, outside your component's immediate view. - Change Detection Strategy: Many component libraries and best practices encourage using
ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush
. This strategy tells Angular to only re-render a component when its@Input()
properties change, or when an event it's listening for is fired from its own template.
When you change a property in your dialog's component class that [ngClass]
is bound to, Angular's default change detection cycle might not know it needs to check this isolated, dynamically created component. The change happens, but the view isn't updated. The result? Your class binding appears broken.
Step 1: The Classic Fix - Manually Triggering Change Detection
The oldest and most direct way to solve this is to tell Angular, "Hey, I made a change here, please update the view!" You do this by injecting Angular’s ChangeDetectorRef
.
This approach is imperative—you are commanding Angular to perform an action. It's like manually tapping the component on the shoulder to get its attention.
How to do it:
Inject ChangeDetectorRef
into your dialog component's constructor. Then, after you update the state that your [ngClass]
depends on, call .detectChanges()
.
import { Component, Inject, ChangeDetectorRef } from '@angular/core'; import { MAT_DIALOG_DATA } from '@angular/material/dialog'; @Component({ selector: 'app-status-dialog', template: ` <h1 mat-dialog-title [ngClass]="statusClass">Update Status</h1> <div mat-dialog-content> <p>Current status is: {{ data.status }}</p> </div> <div mat-dialog-actions> <button mat-button (click)="updateStatus('approved')">Approve</button> <button mat-button (click)="updateStatus('rejected')">Reject</button> </div> `, }) export class StatusDialogComponent { statusClass = ''; constructor( @Inject(MAT_DIALOG_DATA) public data: { status: string }, private cdr: ChangeDetectorRef ) { this.setStatusClass(data.status); } updateStatus(newStatus: string): void { this.data.status = newStatus; this.setStatusClass(newStatus); // The magic line! this.cdr.detectChanges(); } private setStatusClass(status: string): void { if (status === 'approved') { this.statusClass = 'text-success'; } else if (status === 'rejected') { this.statusClass = 'text-danger'; } else { this.statusClass = ''; } } }
Pros:
- Simple to understand and implement for a quick fix.
- Very direct and explicit.
Cons:
- It's an imperative approach in a declarative framework, which can feel like a code smell.
- Can lead to code littered with
detectChanges()
calls, making it harder to reason about. - It’s easy to forget, leading to the bug cropping up again.
Step 2: A Modern RxJS Approach with the async
Pipe
A more declarative and "Angular-way" solution is to leverage RxJS and the async
pipe. The async
pipe is brilliant because it not only subscribes to an Observable or Promise for you, but it also automatically triggers change detection whenever a new value is emitted.
By converting your state into a stream, you let Angular's built-in tools handle the change detection lifecycle for you.
How to do it:
Instead of a simple property for your class, create an Observable. A BehaviorSubject
is perfect for this, as it holds the current value for you. Then, in your template, unwrap the value using the async
pipe.
import { Component, Inject } from '@angular/core'; import { MAT_DIALOG_DATA } from '@angular/material/dialog'; import { BehaviorSubject, map } from 'rxjs'; @Component({ selector: 'app-status-dialog-rxjs', template: ` <h1 mat-dialog-title [ngClass]="statusClass$ | async">Update Status</h1> <!-- ... rest of the template ... --> `, }) export class StatusDialogRxjsComponent { private status$ = new BehaviorSubject<string>(this.data.status); // We derive the class object from the status stream public statusClass$ = this.status$.pipe( map(status => { if (status === 'approved') return 'text-success'; if (status === 'rejected') return 'text-danger'; return ''; }) ); constructor(@Inject(MAT_DIALOG_DATA) public data: { status: string }) {} updateStatus(newStatus: string): void { // Just emit the new value. The async pipe handles the rest! this.status$.next(newStatus); } }
Look how clean that updateStatus
method is! No manual change detection needed. You simply push the new state into the stream, and the template reacts accordingly.
Pros:
- Declarative and aligns with reactive programming principles.
- Reduces boilerplate by letting the
async
pipe manage subscriptions and change detection. - Integrates beautifully if your application already uses RxJS for state management.
Cons:
- Requires a foundational understanding of RxJS.
- Can feel like overkill for a very simple, isolated component.
Step 3: The Future-Proof Solution for 2025 - Embracing Angular Signals
Welcome to the future. Angular Signals, introduced in v16 and stabilized in v17, are the new paradigm for reactivity in Angular. They provide an extremely efficient, fine-grained change detection mechanism that sidesteps many of the complexities of Zone.js.
For our dialog problem, Signals are almost a magic bullet. Because they track dependencies and updates at a very granular level, they work flawlessly even in dynamically created components without any manual intervention or stream-wrapping.
How to do it:
Use the signal
primitive to hold your state and a computed
signal to derive the class name. The syntax is incredibly clean and intuitive.
import { Component, Inject, signal, computed } from '@angular/core'; import { MAT_DIALOG_DATA } from '@angular/material/dialog'; @Component({ selector: 'app-status-dialog-signals', template: ` <h1 mat-dialog-title [ngClass]="statusClass()">Update Status</h1> <!-- ... rest of the template ... --> `, }) export class StatusDialogSignalsComponent { // Create a writable signal for the status status = signal(this.data.status); // Create a computed signal for the class // This will automatically re-evaluate when `status` changes statusClass = computed(() => { const currentStatus = this.status(); if (currentStatus === 'approved') return 'text-success'; if (currentStatus === 'rejected') return 'text-danger'; return ''; }); constructor(@Inject(MAT_DIALOG_DATA) public data: { status: string }) {} updateStatus(newStatus: string): void { // Simply update the signal's value. That's it! this.status.set(newStatus); } }
Notice the template binding: [ngClass]="statusClass()"
. You call the computed signal like a function to get its value. When you call this.status.set()
, the signal notifies its dependencies—in this case, the statusClass
computed signal—which in turn notifies the template to update. It's fast, efficient, and requires zero manual change detection.
Pros:
- The most modern and future-proof approach.
- Extremely performant due to fine-grained reactivity.
- Simplest and cleanest syntax of all three methods.
- Glitch-free by design, avoiding intermediate states.
Cons:
- Requires your project to be on Angular v16+ (and ideally v17+ for stable APIs).
Comparison: Which Method Should You Choose?
Let's put all three side-by-side to help you decide.
Criteria | 1. ChangeDetectorRef | 2. RxJS + async Pipe | 3. Angular Signals |
---|---|---|---|
Approach | Imperative | Declarative (Reactive) | Declarative (Fine-Grained Reactive) |
Syntax | Explicit & Manual | Functional & Fluent | Simple & Direct |
Performance | Good (but can be overused) | Very Good | Excellent (most efficient) |
Maintainability | Fair (easy to forget) | Good (requires RxJS knowledge) | Excellent (easy to read and reason about) |
Best For... | Legacy codebases or quick, isolated fixes. | Applications heavily invested in RxJS for state. | All new applications in 2025 and beyond. |
Conclusion: Syncing Up for Good
The mystery of the unsynced [ngClass]
in dialogs has haunted Angular developers for years, but the path forward has never been clearer. While manually triggering change detection with ChangeDetectorRef
still works in a pinch, it's a relic of an older, more imperative style of coding.
The RxJS and async
pipe approach offers a robust, declarative solution that fits perfectly into a reactive architecture. However, for any new project started today or updated for 2025, Angular Signals are the definitive answer. They offer the best performance, the cleanest syntax, and the most intuitive developer experience, solving this classic problem with effortless elegance.
So next time your dynamic component refuses to update, don't reach for detectChanges()
. Instead, embrace the reactive power of Signals and write code that is not only bug-free but also a joy to maintain.
Happy coding, and may your classes always sync!