Your Java Is Boring: 5 Features to Fix It (2025 Guide)
Is your Java code feeling stale? This 2025 guide reveals 5 modern features like Virtual Threads and Records to make your Java development exciting again.
Daniel Petrov
A principal software engineer and JVM enthusiast specializing in high-performance, concurrent systems.
Let's be honest. For years, Java has carried a reputation for being verbose, boilerplate-heavy, and, well... a bit boring. If your daily Java life still revolves around endless getter/setter methods, complex thread management, and messy `instanceof` checks, you're living in the past. The Java of 2025 is a different beast entirely—leaner, more expressive, and genuinely exciting to work with.
The rapid release cadence has delivered a torrent of powerful features that many developers haven't explored yet. It's time to change that. Forget the old stereotypes. We're about to inject some serious life back into your code with five game-changing features that will make you fall in love with Java all over again.
Why Your Java Feels Boring (And How to Fix It)
If you're primarily working with Java 8 or even 11, you're missing out on a paradigm shift. The language has evolved to solve modern problems more elegantly. The feeling of "boring" often comes from writing verbose, ceremonial code to accomplish simple tasks. Modern Java targets this exact problem, offering concise syntax and powerful new runtime features that let you focus on business logic, not boilerplate.
1. Banish Blocking with Virtual Threads (Project Loom)
Concurrency in Java has traditionally been powerful but complex. Platform threads, managed by the operating system, are a heavyweight resource. Creating thousands of them to handle concurrent requests is a recipe for high memory consumption and poor performance. This is where Virtual Threads, finalized in Java 21, change everything.
The Problem: Heavyweight Platform Threads
Imagine a web server handling thousands of simultaneous I/O-bound requests (like database queries or API calls). The traditional approach is one-thread-per-request. This doesn't scale well.
Old Way (Painful):
// Creates an expensive OS thread
Thread thread = new Thread(() -> {
// Some blocking I/O operation
System.out.println("Running in a heavy platform thread!");
});
thread.start();
The Solution: Lightweight Virtual Threads
Virtual threads are lightweight threads managed by the JVM, not the OS. You can create millions of them without breaking a sweat. They are perfect for I/O-bound tasks, as they don't block the underlying OS thread while waiting. This dramatically improves throughput and resource utilization with minimal code changes.
New Way (Effortless):
// Creates a cheap, lightweight virtual thread
Thread.startVirtualThread(() -> {
// Some blocking I/O operation (the magic happens here)
System.out.println("Running in a lightweight virtual thread!");
});
By simply switching to a virtual thread executor or using `Thread.startVirtualThread()`, you can modernize your concurrent applications and achieve massive scalability gains. This is arguably the most significant performance feature added to Java in a decade.
2. Kill Boilerplate with Records
How many times have you written a simple Plain Old Java Object (POJO) to act as a data carrier? You write the fields, then the constructor, then `getters`, then `equals()`, `hashCode()`, and `toString()`. It's tedious, error-prone, and adds hundreds of lines of code for no real business value.
The Problem: Verbose Data Classes
Old Way (So. Much. Code.):
public final class OldPoint {
private final int x;
private final int y;
public OldPoint(int x, int y) {
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
}
public int x() { return x; }
public int y() { return y; }
// ... plus equals(), hashCode(), and toString()
}
The Solution: Concise Records
Records, introduced in Java 16, are the ultimate fix. They are transparent, immutable carriers for data. You declare the fields, and the compiler generates the constructor, accessors, `equals()`, `hashCode()`, and `toString()` for you. What once took 50 lines now takes one.
New Way (Beautifully Simple):
public record Point(int x, int y) {}
// That's it. You're done.
Point p = new Point(10, 20);
System.out.println(p.x()); // Accessor
System.out.println(p); // toString() is included
Adopting records cleans up your codebase immediately, making it more readable and maintainable.
3. Supercharge Your Logic with Pattern Matching
Complex conditional logic, especially involving type checks, has always been clunky in Java. The `instanceof` operator followed by an explicit cast is a common but awkward pattern.
The Problem: Clunky `instanceof` and Cast
Old Way (Verbose and Unsafe):
void printObject(Object obj) {
if (obj instanceof String) {
String s = (String) obj;
System.out.println("String: " + s.toUpperCase());
} else if (obj instanceof Integer) {
Integer i = (Integer) obj;
System.out.println("Integer: " + i);
}
}
The Solution: Elegant Pattern Matching
Pattern Matching for `instanceof` (Java 16) and Pattern Matching for `switch` (Java 21) revolutionize this. The `instanceof` check can now declare a variable, eliminating the cast. Even better, `switch` can now operate on types and deconstruct records.
New Way (Clean and Expressive):
// With pattern matching for switch
void printObjectModern(Object obj) {
switch (obj) {
case String s -> System.out.println("String: " + s.toUpperCase());
case Integer i -> System.out.println("Integer: " + i);
case Point(int x, int y) -> System.out.println("Point at " + x + "," + y);
case null -> System.out.println("It's null!");
default -> System.out.println("Unknown object.");
}
}
This code is not only shorter but also safer (the `switch` can be checked for completeness by the compiler) and far more readable. It allows you to express complex, data-oriented logic in a clear and declarative way.
Feature | Old Java (e.g., Java 8/11) | Modern Java (21+) |
---|---|---|
Concurrency | Heavyweight, OS-level Platform Threads. Hard to scale. | Lightweight, JVM-managed Virtual Threads. Massively scalable. |
Data Classes | Verbose POJOs with manual getters, setters, equals(), hashCode(). | Concise `record` classes with all boilerplate auto-generated. |
Type Checking | `if (obj instanceof Type) { Type t = (Type) obj; ... }` | `if (obj instanceof Type t) { ... }` or `case Type t -> ...` |
Collections | No standard way to get first/last element. Relied on `List` index or workarounds. | `SequencedCollection` interface with `getFirst()`, `getLast()`, `reversed()`. |
4. Glimpse the Future with Value Objects (Project Valhalla)
While the previous features are already available, it's crucial to know what's coming next. Project Valhalla is poised to introduce one of the biggest changes to the JVM in its history: Value Objects.
Currently in Java, you have a choice between primitives (`int`, `double`), which are fast but not objects, and class instances (e.g., `Integer`), which are flexible but have memory overhead (object header, pointer indirection).
Value Objects aim to give us the best of both worlds: classes that behave like primitives. These will be objects without identity, meaning their `==` operator will work like `equals()`. They can be flattened in memory arrays, eliminating overhead and dramatically improving performance for data-heavy applications. Think of a `Point` class whose instances can be packed into an array just like `int`s.
While still a preview feature, keeping an eye on Value Objects is essential for anyone building performance-critical systems. It signals Java's commitment to being a top-tier platform for high-performance computing.
5. Simplify Your Collections with Sequenced Collections
This is a smaller but incredibly welcome quality-of-life improvement introduced in Java 21. Have you ever had a `LinkedHashSet` and needed to get the last element added? It was surprisingly difficult. You'd have to iterate or convert it to a list.
The new Sequenced Collections interfaces (`SequencedCollection`, `SequencedSet`, `SequencedMap`) solve this by providing a unified API for any collection that has a defined encounter order.
The Problem: Inconsistent Collection Access
Getting the first or last element was different depending on the collection type (`List`, `Deque`, `SortedSet`, etc.).
The Solution: A Unified API
Any class implementing `SequencedCollection` now has these methods:
- `getFirst()`: Get the first element.
- `getLast()`: Get the last element.
- `addFirst()` / `addLast()`: Add elements at the beginning or end.
- `removeFirst()` / `removeLast()`: Remove elements.
- `reversed()`: Get a reversed-order view of the collection.
This brings consistency to the Collections Framework and cleans up countless small but annoying workarounds in your code.
Conclusion: Java Isn't Boring Anymore
The narrative of Java being a stagnant, boring language is officially dead. With virtual threads for unparalleled concurrency, records for boilerplate-free data modeling, and pattern matching for expressive logic, modern Java is a joy to use. These features aren't just syntactic sugar; they represent a fundamental shift towards a more productive and performant development experience.
So, the next time you start a new project or refactor an old one, don't reach for the familiar patterns of Java 8. Embrace the modern toolkit. Your code will be cleaner, your applications faster, and your job a whole lot more exciting.